Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Oregon Scientific DS6639

Oregon Scientific DS6639
alaScore 74

44 reviews

May, 2024

alaTest has collected and analyzed 44 reviews of Oregon Scientific DS6639. The average rating for this product is 2.6/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Digital Compact Cameras the Oregon Scientific DS6639 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 74/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 44 reviews)

1 expert reviews

User Reviews  

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 36 of 36 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (5)

Consumer review (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for Oregon Scientific DS6639

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 7 user reviews of Oregon Scientific DS6639 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 2.9/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras on Amazon.co.uk.

43% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

May, 2024

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Oregon Scientific DS6639

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 21 user reviews of Oregon Scientific DS6639 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 2.7/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.2/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras on Amazon.com.

62% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

May, 2024

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Oregon Scientific ds6628

 

Absolutely NONE.

Absolutely EVERYTHING.

Jun, 2007

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Where'd they get this awful CCD

 

Easy to use menus.

Lacking in color and brightness reproduction - easy to white wash or black out.

Feb, 2007

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Where'd they get this awful CCD?

 

I didn't actually pay anything for this camera, so I'm not suffering from buyer's remorse. It was an award from my wife's home business. I do enjoy taking pictures, but I'm not even close to being a professional photographer. Picture ...

Easy to use menus

Lacking in color and brightness reproduction - easy to white wash or black out

Feb, 2007

Consumer review (epinions.com)

No Flash

 

Slim and trendy.

No flash.

Feb, 2006

Consumer review (epinions.com)

My Favorite Christmas Gift!

 

Convenience, it fits in my purse or pocket.

The small print in the Instruction booklet.

Jan, 2006

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Worth it?

 

I decided to get this camera because I wanted a little something to take some fun shots with around campus. When I opened the box, the camera actually looks and feels solid. It's got one of the best looking designs out there but thats where all of the ...

Colors, Size, Overall Design (look)

VERY Poor button layout (cheap), blurry pictures, battery life

Dec, 2005

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Cheap price. Cheap Quality.

 

Cheap. Design.

Battery Life. Unreliable. bad screen. mediocre picture quality. flash too bright.

Dec, 2005

Consumer review (epinions.com)

An okay toy, not much of a camera

 

I purchased this 'camera' as a gift for my 10 year old daughter, because she was envious of her older sister's digital camera, a canon A-70, and I thought this would give her something to play with and learn a little bit about photography at the same ...

Small size, cheap price

Image quality is beneath contempt, battery life is absurd

Feb, 2005

Price comparison for Oregon Scientific DS6639

Top 5 Digital Cameras