Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Panasonic KX TG5438F

Panasonic KX TG5438F
alaScore 75

30 reviews

Sep, 2016

alaTest has collected and analyzed 30 reviews of Panasonic KX TG5438F. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Cordless Phones for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Cordless Phones the Panasonic KX TG5438F is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 75/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 30 reviews)

User Reviews  

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 30 of 30 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Panasonic KX TG5438F

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 28 user reviews of Panasonic KX TG5438F from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.8/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Cordless Phones on Amazon.com.

71% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Panasonic KX-TG5438F 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Shock and Splash Resistant Digital Cordless Answering SystemPanasonic KX-TG5438F 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Shock and Splash Resistant Digital Cordless Answering System

Sep, 2016

Consumer review by: N/A (newegg.com)

wireless friendly

 

Good value for the money with better reception than other 5.8ghz.

Interesting color for which the photo do not do justice. Clear reception from anywhere in the house. Very configurable. Does not interfere wire wireless network

voice changer is too easy to turn on

May, 2006

Consumer review by: N/A (newegg.com)

Panasonic KX-TG5438F 5.8 GHz FHSS 1X Handsets Cordless Phone Integrated Answering Machine - Retail

 

A truly awesome phone with a long lasting battery too!

This phone is so cool! Why

The only con is that the phone will only hold two downloaded ringtones. But how many would you really need

May, 2006