Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Panasonic KX TC1703

Panasonic KX TC1703
alaScore 71

34 reviews

Aug, 2018

alaTest has collected and analyzed 34 reviews of Panasonic KX TC1703. The average rating for this product is 3.3/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Cordless Phones for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Cordless Phones the Panasonic KX TC1703 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 71/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 34 reviews)

User Reviews  


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 34 of 34 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review ( review summary for Panasonic KX TC1703


alaTest has collected and analyzed 25 user reviews of Panasonic KX TC1703 from The average user rating for this product is 2.9/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Cordless Phones on

56% of the reviews on give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Panasonic KXTC1703B 900MHz Cordless Phone with Caller ID (Black)Panasonic KXTC1703B 900MHz Cordless Phone with Caller ID (Black)

Aug, 2018

Consumer review (

Introducting the Panasonic KX-TC1703B


Digital 900 MHz, Caller ID, Handset Speakerphone, and many more


Apr, 2002

Consumer review (

This one's a keeper


I tried this phone after a not-so-great experience with the GE 26930, and what an improvement. Nice sound, sonorous ring, decent range.

All-around satisfactory

Can't program Local Area Code

Mar, 2002

Consumer review (

Great phone for the price.


I returned my vtech 2.4ghz phone and bought this one. The sound is great (no static at all, especially compared to the vtech 2.4ghz). The hands free mode works very well and it comes with a nice set of features. Didn't buy the one with the answering...

Great sound, nice set of features, and excellent hands free mode.

Don't use caller id so can't tell you if it works nicely. Otherwise no cons.

Jan, 2002

Consumer review (

I can't believe people are saying the voice quality is excellent


Just bought this cordless phone after buying a 2.4Ghz DSS phone made by GE. I took the GE phone back because outgoing voice quality sounded muffled to those I was talking to. I read that Panasonic phones rate highly, and the other reviews said voice...

Nice features, inexpensive

Voice quality suffers

Jan, 2002

Consumer review (

Finally - a cheap, reliable cordless


I get a lot of phone calls in my job, and do a lot of moving around different offices. Originally in my office, I had a standard touch-tone corded phone, which I thought I could replace with an older cordless phone that we didn't want at home anymore...

Ease of use, clear calls, portable speaker

None yet

Jan, 2002

Consumer review (

This is a great phone!


I absolutely love this phone. I bought it after owning an AT&T 900 MHz phone which I could not stand! The reception was horrible, and the battery didn't seen to last very long. When that phone finally died, I decided it was time for a new brand, so...

Great Reception

Difficult for the non-mechanical person to figure out

Jan, 2002

Consumer review (

Quality and Durability Count


Less than a year ago I made a mistake of purchasing a telephone based solely on brand-name. For most of the past seventy-five years it's been easy to take for granted that your telephone would be virtually indestructible. For all the faults it may...

Simple operation.Clear reception.Speaker phone integrated with handset.Solid, quality construction

Base doesn't completely cover plate for the old wall phone. No phone in base

Jan, 2002

Consumer review (

And your reason for not having one is?


Let me start off by saying that even though I have not had this phone a week, I am already amazed.

Small, lightweight, caller ID, hold

none so far

Dec, 2001

Consumer review (

A Phone With The Three C's: Comfortable, Cordless, Caller ID


compact, comfortable, easy to use

beeps whenever you replace it in the cradle

Sep, 2001