Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Motorola L402

Motorola L402
alaScore 80

280 reviews

Dec, 2016

alaTest has collected and analyzed 280 reviews of Motorola L402. The average rating for this product is 3.4/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Cordless Phones for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Cordless Phones the Motorola L402 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 80/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 280 reviews)

User Reviews  

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 264 of 279 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Motorola L402

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 254 user reviews of Motorola L402 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.4/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Cordless Phones on Amazon.com.

68% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Corded and Dect 6.0 Combo PhonCorded and Dect 6.0 Combo Phon

Dec, 2016

Consumer review by: GREGORY O. (newegg.com)

Senior Citizen Review

 

Perhaps I am too old with deteriorating vision and larger fingers to use this model Motorola. Our work Motorola equipment was excellent and extremely reliable.

Ring tones

Printing on the handsets and desktop unit are hard to see without using a magnifying glass. I can read the numbers on all units. Keys are flat rather than raised making them harder to use. Gave the Motorola phone system to a neighbor to use with in...

Sep, 2014

Consumer review by: tony, (tigerdirect.com)

good phone, poor buttons

 

nice looking phone, and the speaker phone has a decent volume and is clear. I agree with the other review... the buttons are really hard to press. The design of the buttons is really poor.

May, 2013

Consumer review by: Keeplosingearbuds, (tigerdirect.com)

2 for 1 phone

 

Great phone with one corded handset and one wireless: 2 for 1. Sound and features are good. It is not as heavy-duty as you might find in the office but adequate for my needs. The wireless handset is small and slippery like most phones now. I did not...

May, 2013

Consumer review by: cramersec (tigerdirect.com)

Not impressed

 

As mentioned, the keys are very stiff. The key beep is not consistent, so you're not sure if you've pressed it or not. Even the remotes' keys are stiff. Not the most intuitive interface.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: George, (tigerdirect.com)

Great Value for the Price

 

Everything seems to work fine, including the bluetooth (which I may or may not use). Bluetooth works good on my samsung, but is a little flaky on my cheaper cell phone, probably the cell not the motorola.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: (tigerdirect.com)

Good looking phone

 

That's about it. The keypads are so stiff it is difficult to dial phone numbers. The cordless phones are scratchy, with a background buzz or constant hissing sound. The range on the cordless phones is miserable, with breakup starting at 25-30 ft.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: Ben, (tigerdirect.com)

Good phone for Right price

 

I am happy with this phone and its features. The blue tooth connectivity seems to be a little flaky but it isn't a feature I really use.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: Sing, (tigerdirect.com)

Keyboardis stiff

 

keyboard is still. It's a little hard to press the button. The most disapointed is the caller id only show about 1 or 2 second. You will easy miss it.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: CIC Dave, (tigerdirect.com)

Good phone with terrible buttons

 

I love that I now have a wired in base unit (no more lost cordless). The performance of the phones is good.I don't like the buttons. You have to press very hard to get them to work. I blame this on the membrane that's over the keypad.

Apr, 2013

Consumer review by: robertolapiedra (tigerdirect.com)

Good value

 

Adequate for the price

Apr, 2013