Samsung SP-43T5HP

7 reviews

Nov, 2024

Positive
image quality (4)
usability (3)
price (3)
reliability (2)
sound (2)

Negative

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 7 reviews of Samsung SP-43T5HP. The average rating for this product is 1.7/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews. Views about the color and design are overall positive. The sound and usability are also appreciated, but comments about the reliability and image quality are different.

price, usability, sound, design, color

On average, users rate this product 34/100.

See all Samsung TVs

Review analysis

(Based on 7 reviews)

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(no reviews)
(no reviews)
(29% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (14% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews (57% of reviews)
Show all 1 star reviews

Features

image quality
Show positive (50%)Show negative (50%)(Show all)

price
Show positive (60%)Show negative (40%)(Show all)

reliability
Show positive (50%)Show negative (50%)(Show all)

usability
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

sound
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

Show more features

Showing 7 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

OK

i found that this product was great at teh time it had a huge screen and the sound was very impressive when it came to watching movies with explosion sand musical times. i liked the features it had too and the menu system was pretty nice there. the...

huge screen and very bright in colour and picture

picture quality is not the clearest

Jan, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

Bad

definatly not value for money 2500.00 in 2004.would like to see offer of discount fix or recall from samsung.

good while working

length of time it lasted

Aug, 2008

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

OK

This screen was reliable even though we were praying that it wouldn't be because we had the three year warranty. The TV goes out of focus every now and again. The picture has become quite fuzzy now. Its viewing angles are very narrow. This is not so...

Reliable, stylish for the money

Poor picture quality. Very narrow viewing angles especially vertically, susceptible to dust. Cheap feel to the buttons

Sep, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

P.O.S.

We bought one of these new with a 12 month warrenty, and it packed up after 2-3 weeks after the cooling oil leaked out. It was repaired under warrenty, and worked for another 14 months until the same thing happened again.Ripped off.

big screen

not reliable

Apr, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

Terrible

Samsung really needs to get its act together on this .!

From a technical view -easy to get at and easy to adjust.

All rear projection Samsung TVs gather moisture around the focus connection,on the Cathode Ray Tubes. There are unconnected wires with no labels. This is very confusing and possibly a danger if connected up can ruin the picture tubes.

Aug, 2006

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

Terrible

Very poor customer service that will take you to great depths of frustration.

Can't remember

Bought the TV 01/09/04 and it packed it in 5 months later.Two moths later still trying to sort out refunded with Samaung.

May, 2005

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

Terrible

Clearly a faulty product and Samsung doesn't want to know about it! Love to hear from other Samsung rear projection TV owners with similar problems

Good Picture quality and Sound

Samsung Rear projection TV's are crap for reliability Bought one just before Syndey Olympics Tube when in it within 9 months sent to samsung returned 2 months later repaired Luckily bought extended warranty with Harvey Norman as 10 months later it did...

May, 2005

Read the full review