Visioneer OneTouch 8920

214 reviews

Nov, 2024

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 214 reviews of Visioneer OneTouch 8920. The average rating for this product is 2.9/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other products in the same category the Visioneer OneTouch 8920 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 76/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 214 reviews)

Expert Reviews

User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 107 of 214 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Visioneer OneTouch 8920

alaTest has collected and analyzed 97 user reviews of Visioneer OneTouch 8920 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 2.4/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com.

43% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Nov, 2024

Expert review by (itreviews.co.uk)

Visioneer - OneTouch 8920

The OneTouch 8920 from Visioneer is a quick, easy to use scanner, which comes with a good software bundle. However, this is another scanner that sacrifices quality for speed. One of the best points of the ...

Sep, 2002

Read the full review

Expert review by (pcworld.com)

Visioneer OneTouch 7300 USB

Compact, easy-to-use scanner is priced right, but this no-frills model lacks power.

The compact Visioneer OneTouch 7300 is easy to set up and use anywhere, but if you want speed, look elsewhere.

Mar, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : Jasmine France (cnet.com)

Visioneer OneTouch review

Visioneer OneTouch

Thin and light; gets power from USB port; makes good scans all around; lots of configuration options; inexpensive.

No film or slide scanning; lid doesn't come off all the way; Windows only.

Mobile professionals and students will love the low price, the portability, and the quality results of Visioneer's OneTouch 7300 flatbed scanner.

Jan, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : By Richard Jantz (pcworld.com)

Visioneer OneTouch 8920 USB

Affordable, easy-to-use USB scanner produces especially sharp line art.

Nov, 2001

Read the full review

Expert review by (pcmag.com)

Visioneer OneTouch 8920 USB

The Visioneer OneTouch 8920 USB and the 9000 USB are sleek, stylish devices that fit nicely in any professional environment. As is appropriate for the business market, image quality takes a backseat to great performance.

Partner Source

Read the full review

Expert review by : Consumer Guide (howstuffworks.com)

Visioneer OneTouch 7300 scanner Review and Prices

Visioneer's thin and light OneTouch 7300 flatbed scanner is a great option for home users who want an easy-to-use, low-cost scanning machine.

Jun, 2006

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Visioneer OneTouch 7300 USB Interface Flatbed Scanner - Retail

Good speed and results for the price.

Old, quirky drivers, sometimes takes a bit of fiddling before things work okay.

Apr, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Going backwards

Nice box.

Old drivers, slow, and uhhh, it's a Visioneer.

Apr, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Intel fine, AMD

This is a good basic scanner with perfectly adequate software for the budget minded who don't need advanced features.

The hardware installed fine on my two Intel based machines, but would not install on my AMD machine.

Oct, 2006

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Intel fine, AMD ???

Very thin, light, portable, can go from home to office in a bag, no power supply to lug around.

This is a good basic scanner with perfectly adequate software for the budget minded who don't need advanced features. Paperport is a big plus. Gets all power from USB, no wall wart

The hardware installed fine on my two Intel based machines, but would not install on my AMD machine

Oct, 2006

Read the full review