Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Samsung SPF-85H

11 reviews

Nov, 2024

Positive
usability (1)

Negative
design (2)

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 11 reviews of Samsung SPF-85H. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 3.9/5 for other Digital Photo Frames for all reviews. Reviewers really like the usability, whereas many are critical about the design.

usability

design

On average, users rate this product 78/100.

Review analysis

(Based on 11 reviews)

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(27% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (45% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (9% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (18% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews (no reviews)

Features

design
None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)

usability
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

Showing 2 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (9)

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Disappointed

I bought this frame primarily because I've been happy with the picture quality of the Samsung television and computer monitor that I own and also for the large internal memory. This was the third frame that I have purchased, though my first Samsung...

Only the appearence of the frame when turned off

Disappointed in the picture quality. Images appear dim and not very vivid. Single option for picture adjustment is brightness which, if increased, only made the images appear washed out. Also had problems with the internal memory. Extremely slow to...

Apr, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Everything is not what you see

Will have to explore more, but I like what I have seen so far --except for the battery options -very disappointed by the fact that it's not so portable!

The menu bottoms light-up when active and are hidden when not in use, was worried about this since not in description

Rechargeable Battery inside is not a true statement

Mar, 2009

Read the full review