Panasonic NV-GS70 Reviews & Tests

Consumer review (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for Panasonic NV-GS70

alaTest has collected and analyzed 13 user reviews of Panasonic NV-GS70 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other Camcorders on Amazon.co.uk. Reviewers are impressed by the durability and battery. The portability and usability also get good feedback, whereas opinions are divided on the price.

image quality, usability, portability, battery, durability

100% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

Nov, 2024

Expert review by : Laurence Grayson (cnet.com.au)

Panasonic NV-GS70

This is an attractive prospect if you want a three-chip camcorder, but a similarly-priced single-chip model will probably provide better image definition if you want decent still-image capture as well.

Low price ; Three-chip image sensor ; Full manual control options ; Compact and lightweight ; Quick start mode

CCD resolution is a little on the low side ; Poor still capture ; Slightly tricky switchgear

If image definition and still capture is more important to you that colour, then you´ll be better off with a similarly-priced single-chip model, otherwise, you should give the NV-GS70 a look.

Jan, 2004

Partner Source

Read the full review

Expert review by : Laurence Grayson (zdnet.com.au)

Panasonic NV-GS70

This is an attractive prospect if you want a three-chip camcorder, but a similarly-priced single-chip model will probably provide better image definition if you want decent still-image capture as well.

Dec, 2003

Read the full review

Consumer review (epinions.com)

An Idiot Beginner's POV of a Cheaper 3CCD Digicam: the Panasonic NV-GS70

Please note I am reviewing the Panasonic NV-GS70EN, naming conventions seem to be different for the same product in Asia (from the States ? it's all very confusing to me why they do this.. Canon does as well), so I think I am putting this in the...

Size, 3ccd etc

less pixels, reduced functions, dodgy zoom button

Dec, 2003

Read the full review