Panasonic NV-GS200 Reviews & Tests

Expert review by : Newcomers to digital video once had a choice of on (computervideo.net)

Ulead VideoStudio 8 test and review

Ulead has finally come out fighting against Pinnacle's market-leading budget video editor, Studio. Enter VideoStudio 8

Aug, 2004

Expert review by : Colin Barrett (simplydv.co.uk)

SimplyDV Review: Panasonic NV-GS200EB DV Camcorder

Great 3CCD image quality, good physical handling, excellent range of functions. 20x digital zoom better than expected, top-loading of tapes.

500x digital zoom is useless, letterbox widescreen not outstanding.

At its price, the GS200 is an excellent 3CCD camcorder (as is the GS120) Picture quality is fantastic, and top-loading is the icing on the cake. This deserves a full rating!

Read the full review

Expert review by : Geeta Dayal (cnet.com.au)

Panasonic NV-GS200

One of the two most compact three-chip MiniDV cameras on the market.

Extremely compact for a three-CCD model ; Top-notch colour reproduction ; Solid manual controls ; Broad feature set

Poor low-light performance ; Mediocre stills ; Suboptimal image stabilisation

Editor's note: The Panasonic NV-GS200 is known as the Panasonic PV-GS200 in the US. .

Jan, 2004

Partner Source

Read the full review

Expert review by : Easy Camcorder (easycamcorders.com)

Expert Review

This year the Panasonic PV-GS200 won a CamInfo select award for best camcorder under $1,000. It is certainly the most advanced 3 CCD camcorder in this price range, the only other real competitor being its sibling the PV-GS120. Expect a lot of...

Low light performance, - Manual Control options, - Video performance, - Handling, - Focus ring, - Still performance

Ease of use

Dec, 2004

Read the full review

Consumer review (productreview.com.au)

Bad

After only 5 videos had component failure - unfortunately out of warranty as I have not used it much - found some cameras on the market that take top quality photos and excellent videos. Will go for one of these. Won't buy this brand again.

Compact and ease of use

Photos and MPEG not of good quality

May, 2008

Read the full review