Samsung Syncmaster 213T

99 reviews

Apr, 2024

Positive
design (16)
usability (16)
price (15)
size (8)
reliability (3)

Negative

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 99 reviews of Samsung Syncmaster 213T. The average rating for this product is 4.6/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews. People are impressed by the reliability and size. The usability and design also get good views.

price, design, usability, size, reliability

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other products in the same category the Samsung Syncmaster 213T is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 87/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 99 reviews)

Expert Reviews

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(73% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (24% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (3% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (no reviews)
(no reviews)

Features

price
Show positive (60%)Show negative (40%)(Show all)

design
Show positive (80%)Show negative (20%)(Show all)

usability
Show positive (94%)Show negative (6%)(Show all)

size
Show positive (67%)Show negative (33%)(Show all)

reliability
Show positive (75%)Show negative (25%)(Show all)

Showing 78 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 29 of 78 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (21)

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Samsung Syncmaster 213T

alaTest has collected and analyzed 19 user reviews of Samsung Syncmaster 213T from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.8/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.2/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com. Reviewers are impressed by the size and price. The design and usability are also appreciated.

usability, design, price, size

100% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Apr, 2024

Expert review by : GadgetSpeak (gadgetspeak.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T

This 21.3inch panel can be used either portrait or landscape and is easily big enough to display two pages of a Word document side by side. That however is only a small part of it's abilities.

Nov, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : Alfred Poor (pcmag.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T

And an investment it is. At 20 inches or bigger, LCD prices can cost up to several thousand dollars. Our roundup tries to ease the pinch in your wallet by bringing you 20-inch or bigger monitors that all cost under $1,000. The LG Flatron L2013P...

Portrait-mode rotation. Excellent image quality. Analog and digital connections and cables

Weak printed documentation. Considerable smearing on moving images

The SyncMaster 213T from Samsung is an excellent monitor, from the high-quality LCD panel to the design detail throughout. Portrait-mode rotation, a fully adjustable stand, and a three-year warranty make it an outstanding package.

Mar, 2005

Partner Source

Read the full review

Expert review by : James Galbraith (pcworld.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T

Slightly larger screen for comparable price

Colors change with viewing angle ; Not very flexible

Aug, 2003

Read the full review

Expert review by (xyz computing)

213T LCD Display

Apr, 2005

Read the full review

Expert review by : James Galbraith (macworld.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T

The SyncMaster 213T is a good choice for people who want a large LCD but have a mid-size budget.

Inexpensive ; multiple inputs ; pivot-enabled

No color space or contrast controls in digital mode

The SyncMaster 213T we tested has a thin, silver bezel, though a black version is also available. Its controls are right on the front of the display and clearly marked. Some may think that placing buttons on the front of the display detracts from a...

Dec, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : Jacob Lumetta (bonafidereviews.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T 21.3" LCD Monitor

Aug, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : SLCentral (slcentral)

Expert Review

Aug, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : Asim Zaidi (bytesector.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T

It is a great monitor with a great size; although it does not offer so much in performance it makes it up in features.

Jun, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : Hi-TEK (modthebox.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T TFT-LCD Monitor Review

The growing need for high-end computer equipment is often dictated by the system requirements of today's popular application software. Consumers are often faced with using expensive workstations, servers and more graphical displays to complete multiple...

Good picture quality and display ; Three year warranty support ; Aesthetically pleasing design ; Easy to navigate on screen display menu ; Adjustable stand and excellent pivot features ; Free Pivot Pro application software

Slight ghosting images noted ; Not really suitable for the gaming crowd ; Landscape mode takes a while to be productive ; No Magic Bright option to adjust custom contrast levels ; Price

The Samsung SyncMaster 213T TFT-LCD Monitor can classified as a high-end monitor that balances multi-purpose function with good built-in ergonomic features. The selling point of this product is the ability to adjust the display position of the monitor...

Mar, 2004

Read the full review

Expert review by : HardwareCentral (hardwarecentral.com)

Samsung SyncMaster 213T Review

Big size, high resolution, portrait/landscape pivotability, Exceptionally flexible tilt/swivel/height-adjustable base

Big size, high resolution, portrait/landscape pivotability, Exceptionally flexible tilt/swivel/height-adjustable base, Slightly dark and short on color-temperature settings for graphics pros

The SyncMaster 213T has both VGA analog and DVI-D digital inputs, to work with older and newer PC graphics cards -- or one of each, since a button on the front bezel lets you switch between video sources. Its power supply (75 watts maximum) is...

Oct, 2003

Read the full review