Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Samsung i320N

alaTest has collected and analyzed 7 reviews of Samsung i320N. The average rating for this product is 3.2/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Cell phones for all reviews. People really like the screen and portability. The reliability and design also get good feedback. There are some negative opinions about the camera and connectivity, and there are some mixed reviews about the battery.

performance, design, reliability, portability, screen

connectivity, camera

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Cell phones the Samsung i320N is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 77/100 = Good quality.

See all Samsung Mobile Phones

Review analysis

(Based on 7 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Showing 7 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by: Daniel Lim (hardwarezone.com.sg)

First Looks: Samsung i320N Mobile Phone

 

The new Samsung SGH-i320N is designed to cater for those who think text input through a QWERTY keyboard is faster and better than hand writing or the conventional keypad.

Oct, 2006

Expert review by: Ross Catanzariti (goodgearguide.com.au)

Samsung i320N

 

The Samsung i320N offers sleek and sophisticated looks in a very thin package, and comes with a solid set of features. Unfortunately, a poorly designe...

Two batteries included, thin design, good multimedia features, solid display

Keypad design, no 3G connectivity, below average battery life, some below average specifications, poor camera, no included microSD card

A solid but not outstanding smart phone, the i320N is lacking in a few key specifications, most notably the lack of 3G support and slower Bluetooth and USB interfaces.

May, 2007

Expert review by: Ross Catanzariti (goodgearguide.com.au)

Samsung i320N

 

The Samsung i320N offers sleek and sophisticated looks in a very thin package, and comes with a solid set of features. Unfortunately, a poorly designe...

Two batteries included, thin design, good multimedia features, solid display

Keypad design, no 3G connectivity, below average battery life, some below average specifications, poor camera, no included microSD card

A solid but not outstanding smart phone, the i320N is lacking in a few key specifications, most notably the lack of 3G support and slower Bluetooth and USB interfaces.

Feb, 2007

Expert review by: David Flynn (cnet.com.au)

Samsung i320N

 

The BlackBerry popularised the concept of push e-mail, but Samsung's i320N is one of several promising "BlackBerry killers" jostling for a share of the lucrative business arena as well as self-employed mobile professionals and power users.

Superb slim design ; Bright screen ; Fast performance ; Includes spare battery

Awkward keyboard ; Relatively short battery life ; Uses GSM instead of 3G

The modest battery life (rated at 3.5 hours of talk time and 140 hours on standby) is dictated by the need for a small battery to keep the i320N's svelte shape, but we were delighted at Samsung's inclusion of a second battery and even a hard plastic...

Dec, 2006

Expert review by: David Flynn (zdnet.com.au)

Samsung i320N

 

The BlackBerry popularised the concept of push e-mail, but Samsung's i320N is one of several promising "BlackBerry killers" jostling for a share of the lucrative business arena as well as self-employed mobile professionals and power users.

Dec, 2006

Expert review by: Daniel Lim (hardwarezone.com)

First Looks: Samsung i320N Mobile Phone

 

The new Samsung SGH-i320N is designed to cater for those who think text input through a QWERTY keyboard is faster and better than hand writing or the conventional keypad.

Oct, 2006

Consumer review by: Guest user (productreview.com.au)

Good

 

THE GOOD: Superb slim design. Bright screen. Fast performance. Includes spare battery. THE BAD: Awkward keyboard. Relatively short battery life. Uses GSM instead of 3G. OVERALL: This Samsung smartphone is definitely a BlackBerry killer!

Dec, 2006