Visit our Business Solutions website >>

V-Tech Cordless VT-2468

V-Tech Cordless VT-2468
alaScore 65

31 reviews

Dec, 2016

alaTest has collected and analyzed 31 reviews of V-Tech Cordless VT-2468. The average rating for this product is 2.1/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Cordless Phones for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Cordless Phones the V-Tech Cordless VT-2468 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 65/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 31 reviews)

User Reviews  

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 27 of 31 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for V-Tech Cordless VT-2468

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 17 user reviews of V-Tech Cordless VT-2468 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 2.4/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Cordless Phones on Amazon.com.

35% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: VTech 2468 2.4 Ghz with Caller ID and Integrated Digital Answering Machine (Silver/Black)VTech 2468 2.4 Ghz with Caller ID and Integrated Digital Answering Machine (Silver/Black)

Dec, 2016

Consumer review by: Ezremote (shopzilla.com)

VTech Cordless 2468 - not recommended

 

Easy to use, set-up, etc

LOW Battery life. Can't be off charger more than 1 or 2 hrs

Feb, 2004

Consumer review by: sonofsnood (shopzilla.com)

One of my top 10 worst purchases

 

Looks nice, buttons are easy to get to

Battery life sucks, too much static

Jan, 2004

Consumer review by: kat (shopzilla.com)

Unreliable

 

Looks nice. Easy to set-up.

Battery life and reception horrible

Sep, 2003

Consumer review by: (shopzilla.com)

well designed and decorative

 

product is very well designed very high teck easy to use

N/A

Feb, 2003

Consumer review by: Veronique (shopzilla.com)

Doesn't worth it

 

looks nice

very poor sound quality

Dec, 2002

Consumer review by: dareyac (epinions.com)

This is the worst phone I ever bought

 

None

It is a waste of money

May, 2004

Consumer review by: dukeofwagner (epinions.com)

Do Not Buy

 

None:What difference does low cost make when the product doesn't function?

Does Not Work

Feb, 2004

Consumer review by: wornoutmom (epinions.com)

You get what you pay for

 

Over all it not a bad phone compared to the GE phone I took back. It has alot of options on it for the money. I love the directory it has on it. I believe it stores up to 40 numbers in the directory and 40 in the caller ID. Thats a lot compared to most...

Number Storage, options, Price & look

Battery life is horrible, Some settings are a pain to set.

Jan, 2004

Consumer review by: bronxfreestyle (epinions.com)

WORST PHONE EVER

 

NONE

EVERYTHING

Sep, 2003

Consumer review by: tennischic2006 (epinions.com)

Do not buy unless you get warranty

 

This phone is probably the worst phone I have ever purchased. For the first month it worked alrigh ...

Eye pleasing design....thats about it

Horrible battery life, bad reception, answering machine is hard to figure out

Aug, 2003
1
2