Visit our Business Solutions website >>


alaScore 77

2 reviews

Oct, 2016

alaTest has collected and analyzed 2 reviews of JVC GY-HD201E. The average rating for this product is 3.5/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Camcorders for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the color, but many are critical about the battery and price.


price, battery

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Camcorders the JVC GY-HD201E is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 77/100 = Good quality.

See all JVC Camcorders

Review analysis

(Based on 2 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)
  (100% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)


  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)

Showing 2 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by: James Morris (



JVC differentiates considerably between its consumer and professional ranges. Of all the camcorders on test, the GY-HD201E feels most like TV studio equipment.

Accurate colour capture. Excellent choice of lenses. 50fps progressive capture.

Pricy. No battery or charger as standard. Footage not as sharp as Sony PMW-EX1.

But for more general shooting, one of its lesser siblings would make more sense. It's worth noting that the GY-HD201E uses the high-end IDX system, and doesn't come with batteries or a charger, so add around £1,000 to the price for these. If you don't...

Apr, 2008

Expert review by: James Morris (



Unlike Canon and Sony, JVC differentiates considerably between its consumer and professional ranges, and leaves no middle ground. Compared to other hi...

Accurate colour capture, excellent choice of lenses, 50fps progressive capture

Pricey, no battery or charger as standard, footage not as sharp as Sony PMW-EX1

A decent camcorder, but one of JVC's cheaper models would make sense for many users.

Apr, 2008